<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Iec 61131-3 on Sagatowski GmbH</title>
    <link>https://www.sagatowski.com/tags/iec-61131-3/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Iec 61131-3 on Sagatowski GmbH</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://www.sagatowski.com/tags/iec-61131-3/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>CODESYS is not open-source</title>
      <link>https://www.sagatowski.com/posts/codesys_is_not_open_source/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.sagatowski.com/posts/codesys_is_not_open_source/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&#34;../../images/2025_12_16_codesys_is_not_open_source.png&#34; alt=&#34;2025_12_16_codesys_is_not_open_source.png&#34;&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;From time to time I see posts and comments on the web saying that CODESYS is open-source.&#xA;Normally I ignore making corrections, but last week something weird happened.&#xA;We were involved in a bidding for a contract, where the buyer selected an integrator which of one of the selection criteria for the other system was that they used the open-source IDE/runtime CODESYS.&#xA;It didn&amp;rsquo;t say open.&#xA;It said &lt;strong&gt;open-source&lt;/strong&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
